Click to See Complete Forum and Search --> : .NET 2.0
Michael Q. Gautier
07-15-2002, 07:34 PM
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,373783,00.asp
If they make it easier to use, I guess that means some of the code written
will have to change.
At least it will be one step closer to wider adoption since most people think
Microsoft doesn't get it right until version 3.0
Brian R.
07-16-2002, 12:55 AM
"Michael Q. Gautier" <gautier_michael@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,373783,00.asp
>
>If they make it easier to use, I guess that means some of the code written
>will have to change.
>
>At least it will be one step closer to wider adoption since most people
think
>Microsoft doesn't get it right until version 3.0
>
>
>
>
Thanks for the article, great link. I like hearing about MS making these
changes. I can't afford MS yet, .net, etc. But when I can afford to throw
money at all of latest MS upgrades, it will be a different world, I am sure.
Elena
07-16-2002, 08:37 AM
"Brian R." <CISconsultant@netscape.net> wrote:
>
>Thanks for the article, great link. I like hearing about MS making these
>changes. I can't afford MS yet, .net, etc. But when I can afford to throw
>money at all of latest MS upgrades, it will be a different world, I am sure.
Actually, Brian, the command-line C# compiler and the .Net framework are
free. If you are truly interested in tinkering with .net, you can download
these things and code in any text editor. You don't get all the bells and
whistles of Visual Studio, but you can still write .Net apps.
Elena
patch
07-16-2002, 10:01 AM
Elena wrote in message <3d341387$1@10.1.10.29>...
>
>"Brian R." <CISconsultant@netscape.net> wrote:
>>
>>Thanks for the article, great link. I like hearing about MS making these
>>changes. I can't afford MS yet, .net, etc. But when I can afford to
throw
>>money at all of latest MS upgrades, it will be a different world, I am
sure.
>
>Actually, Brian, the command-line C# compiler and the .Net framework are
>free. If you are truly interested in tinkering with .net, you can download
>these things and code in any text editor. You don't get all the bells and
>whistles of Visual Studio, but you can still write .Net apps.
>
>Elena
check out: http://www.csharp-station.com/Tools.aspx
there's enough tools (syntax-coloring/hiliting mostly) for you not to have
to go with notepad..
also, and I'm defenetly happy with that, there's a syntax-coloring/hiliting
extention for homesite 4.5/5.. the compiler seems to be fairly easy to use
(said the guy who never actually used one.. :)) and there seems to be a
"windows-forms" interface for it.. so what more do you need? ( I bet there's
an extention for vb6 also)..
patch
simon
07-16-2002, 03:56 PM
In addition to that, there is a tool called SharpDevelop, and it is a FREE
OpenSource IDE. Now, are you running out of excuses not to try C# and .NET?
=)
simon.
"patch" <pretpet@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Elena wrote in message <3d341387$1@10.1.10.29>...
>>
>>"Brian R." <CISconsultant@netscape.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>Thanks for the article, great link. I like hearing about MS making these
>>>changes. I can't afford MS yet, .net, etc. But when I can afford to
>throw
>>>money at all of latest MS upgrades, it will be a different world, I am
>sure.
>>
>>Actually, Brian, the command-line C# compiler and the .Net framework are
>>free. If you are truly interested in tinkering with .net, you can download
>>these things and code in any text editor. You don't get all the bells
and
>>whistles of Visual Studio, but you can still write .Net apps.
>>
>>Elena
>
>check out: http://www.csharp-station.com/Tools.aspx
>there's enough tools (syntax-coloring/hiliting mostly) for you not to have
>to go with notepad..
>also, and I'm defenetly happy with that, there's a syntax-coloring/hiliting
>extention for homesite 4.5/5.. the compiler seems to be fairly easy to
use
>(said the guy who never actually used one.. :)) and there seems to be a
>"windows-forms" interface for it.. so what more do you need? ( I bet there's
>an extention for vb6 also)..
>
>patch
>
>
MarkN
07-17-2002, 06:53 AM
There is also a C# plugin for Eclipse (www.eclipse.org) so you can do C#,
Java (real Java), C/C++ and other languages all side-by-side. These are
all opensource. Well, everything but the C# compiler and the .Net framework
from MS which might be the real reason not to do it (No - NOT because it
is from MS). Make sure you read the licensing on those real close.
Just don't currently try C# on Linux. Ok, you might be able to do a little.
"simon" <substring0NOSPAM@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>In addition to that, there is a tool called SharpDevelop, and it is a FREE
>OpenSource IDE. Now, are you running out of excuses not to try C# and .NET?
> =)
>
>simon.
>
>
>"patch" <pretpet@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>Elena wrote in message <3d341387$1@10.1.10.29>...
>>>
>>>"Brian R." <CISconsultant@netscape.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for the article, great link. I like hearing about MS making these
>>>>changes. I can't afford MS yet, .net, etc. But when I can afford to
>>throw
>>>>money at all of latest MS upgrades, it will be a different world, I am
>>sure.
>>>
>>>Actually, Brian, the command-line C# compiler and the .Net framework are
>>>free. If you are truly interested in tinkering with .net, you can download
>>>these things and code in any text editor. You don't get all the bells
>and
>>>whistles of Visual Studio, but you can still write .Net apps.
>>>
>>>Elena
>>
>>check out: http://www.csharp-station.com/Tools.aspx
>>there's enough tools (syntax-coloring/hiliting mostly) for you not to have
>>to go with notepad..
>>also, and I'm defenetly happy with that, there's a syntax-coloring/hiliting
>>extention for homesite 4.5/5.. the compiler seems to be fairly easy to
>use
>>(said the guy who never actually used one.. :)) and there seems to be a
>>"windows-forms" interface for it.. so what more do you need? ( I bet there's
>>an extention for vb6 also)..
>>
>>patch
>>
>>
>
devx.com
Copyright Internet.com Inc. All Rights Reserved