Alan Gillott
03-13-2000, 10:32 AM
Considering the number of people who think VB7 is coming next week or is
already here: haven't you seen the posts asking how to get hold of a copy? I
still thing VB 7 is a bad title. Also, how do you know it won't be VB2001?
Or VB Something catchy. We've already been through one iteration of silly
names with VS 97.
Phil Weber <pweber@teleport.com> wrote in message
news:38c973d3$1@news.devx.com...
> > I thought it was going to be vb.futures, which
> > made eminently more sense...
>
> Jim: ...until VB7 ships and is no longer "future."
>
> Please see the thread, "ATTN: This newsgroup is closing!" in the vb.vb6
> newsgroup. We've been discussing this subject there for the past few days.
> ---
> Phil Weber
> DevX Newsgroup Admin
>
>
already here: haven't you seen the posts asking how to get hold of a copy? I
still thing VB 7 is a bad title. Also, how do you know it won't be VB2001?
Or VB Something catchy. We've already been through one iteration of silly
names with VS 97.
Phil Weber <pweber@teleport.com> wrote in message
news:38c973d3$1@news.devx.com...
> > I thought it was going to be vb.futures, which
> > made eminently more sense...
>
> Jim: ...until VB7 ships and is no longer "future."
>
> Please see the thread, "ATTN: This newsgroup is closing!" in the vb.vb6
> newsgroup. We've been discussing this subject there for the past few days.
> ---
> Phil Weber
> DevX Newsgroup Admin
>
>