VisualAge vs. JBuilder?

Any pointers to a comparative survey of IBM's VisualAge for Jave vs. Borland's
JBuilder?

"Itsik" <irubin@sars.gov.za> wrote:
>
>Any pointers to a comparative survey of IBM's VisualAge for Jave vs. Borland's
>JBuilder?

Read reviews on this site, they should give you some pointers.

for me i think VisualAge for Java is good in Java OO Concept but it very
hard to using it and i think developers like user interface style
microsoft may be Visual Basic of Visual C++
Jbuilder is same that
for my score
OO Concept Easy JDK Version
Enterprise product API
Visual Age for Java 8 4 3
9 = 24/40
JBuilder 6 8 8
4 = 26/40

ok now i can abridge from my socre "JBuilder is winner"
what do you think?




"Itsik" <irubin@sars.gov.za> wrote in message
news:3b5cbbdb$1@news.devx.com...
>
> Any pointers to a comparative survey of IBM's VisualAge for Jave vs.
Borland's
> JBuilder?