Would it be worthwhile having a .Net architecture discussion group?
Printable View
Would it be worthwhile having a .Net architecture discussion group?
"Richardb" <rbuckingham@loyalty-magic.com> wrote in message <news:3b8b2308$1@news.devx.com>...
> Would it be worthwhile having a .Net architecture discussion group?
That would be the C# groups, since B# is obviously only a temporary
transition language. Microsoft Basic is dead. Sure, the corpse is
still twitching, but that's just the Maggots.NET.
--
Joe Foster <mailto:jlfoster%40znet.com> Space Cooties! <http://www.xenu.net/>
WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above They're coming to
because my cats have apparently learned to type. take me away, ha ha!
> Would it be worthwhile having a .NET architecture
> discussion group?
Richard: What would you discuss in such a group?
---
Phil Weber
