Javascript ASP performance

[Bruce]

I was talking with another web application developer yesterday and he made a
comment. He stated that his former company found that, in building ASP pages
with Java script, the performance was much better if the Java script was put
into Include files separate from the ASP pages. Any comments?

[Randy Charles Morin]

I have a hard time believing this one. But only a test might prove
otherwise. Did anybody test this hypothesis?
--
Randy Charles Morin
Author of Programming Windows Services
http://www.kbcafe.com

Feel free to contact me by private email or messenger
MSN Messenger - morin_randy@hotmail.com
Yahoo Messenger - randymorin@yahoo.com

"Bruce" <bruce@podassoc.com> wrote in message
news:3b55a19a$1@news.devx.com...
> I was talking with another web application developer yesterday and he made
a
> comment. He stated that his former company found that, in building ASP
pages
> with Java script, the performance was much better if the Java script was
put
> into Include files separate from the ASP pages. Any comments?
>
>

[Dan]

I have not tested this. My guess is that maybe something got lost in the translation.
Perhaps they were making a case for using Includes (code reuse), and whoever
they told it to misunderstood the reasoning.

"Randy Charles Morin" <rmorin@kbcafe.com> wrote:
>I have a hard time believing this one. But only a test might prove
>otherwise. Did anybody test this hypothesis?
>--
>Randy Charles Morin
>Author of Programming Windows Services
>http://www.kbcafe.com
>
>Feel free to contact me by private email or messenger
>MSN Messenger - morin_randy@hotmail.com
>Yahoo Messenger - randymorin@yahoo.com
>
>"Bruce" <bruce@podassoc.com> wrote in message
>news:3b55a19a$1@news.devx.com...
>> I was talking with another web application developer yesterday and he
made
>a
>> comment. He stated that his former company found that, in building ASP
>pages
>> with Java script, the performance was much better if the Java script was
>put
>> into Include files separate from the ASP pages. Any comments?
>>
>>
>
>