1.5 headaches with generics

[Phaelax]

Now with Tiger, this is how I have to create my Vector for my JTable.

Vector<String> columns = new Vector<String>();

But the data Vector is a Vector of Vectors, and I don't know how the syntax should look for that. Plus, this new method of using generic types allows me to only have 1 type of object in the Vector. Previously, a row of data in my table would look like this:

MP3, String, String, String

When the user double clicked a row, I would get the MP3 object and use its methods to get the path of where the real file is stored. I did not want to display the whole pathname in my table. Anyone help me out here?

[ractoc]

isn't it possible to declare you Vector as followed:

Vector<Object> myVector = new Vector();

Using the most basic Object class should allow you to put most anything in there.

[Phaelax]

hey, good point.