-
Follow up question.
When all is said and done, any clue as to what the .NET CLR will entail.
Meaning, for the non-devlopers, how easy/common will it be for users to have
the ability to run these applications.
Reason I ask is as a web developer it would be wonderfull to be able to use
ONE language for all aspects of development. Currently, we use ASP(VBScript)
server side. VB for COM and VB/VC++ for any client side apps we need to give
to our customers. We do not like distrubuting apps writtin in VB due to the
extra requirments needed to run them. Though, as many are aware there is a
high turnover ratio in the Web World and trying to always have developers
capable of writing and maintaining C++ as well as being able qualified to do
ASP is next to immposible.
Regards,
Robert
"Jon Davis" <jond_123@REMOVE.ME.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:39e9999d$1@news.devx.com...
> It is interpreted at run time, but runs natively with the optional use of
> the JIT (Just In Time) compiler. There is no difference in this regard
> between C# and Java.
>
> Jon
>
>
> "Robert Scoble" <rscoble@fawcette.com> wrote in message
> news:39e96628@news.devx.com...
> > > From what I'm seeing here it seems C# will require some run time
> > enviornment
> > > for client side applications besides the OS it self. Am I readin this
> > right?
> > > I was hoping that C# would compile without the need to be interpreted
at
> > run
> > > time.
> >
> > C# will require the .NET CLR (Common Language Runtime) to work.
> >
> > This does NOT mean that it is interpreted at run time.
> >
> > Robert Scoble
> >
> > ###
> >
> >
>
>
-
Re: Follow up question.
> When all is said and done, any clue as to what the .NET CLR will entail.
> Meaning, for the non-devlopers, how easy/common will it be for users to
have
> the ability to run these applications.
Microsoft has not discussed publicly yet its distribution methods. I would
assume that Microsoft will make an effort to get the .NET CLR everywhere and
make it very easy for developers to deploy .NET/CLR apps, but I don't know
the answer to this question, and I'm not sure anyone else who hasn't signed
an NDA knows either.
Robert Scoble
###
-
Re: Follow up question.
"Robert" <robertfosters@home.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:39e9e7aa$1@news.devx.com...
> When all is said and done, any clue as to what the .NET CLR will entail.
> Meaning, for the non-devlopers, how easy/common will it be for users to
have
> the ability to run these applications.
>
> Reason I ask is as a web developer it would be wonderfull to be able to
use
> ONE language for all aspects of development. Currently, we use
ASP(VBScript)
> server side. VB for COM and VB/VC++ for any client side apps we need to
give
> to our customers. We do not like distrubuting apps writtin in VB due to
the
> extra requirments needed to run them. Though, as many are aware there is a
> high turnover ratio in the Web World and trying to always have developers
> capable of writing and maintaining C++ as well as being able qualified to
do
> ASP is next to immposible.
> Regards,
> Robert
It will probably be included in future Windows versions, or that's how it
seems now. Maybe included with a future IE version too, but I guess it would
be optional unless IE itself was rewritten using it.
/Carl
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
Top DevX Stories
Easy Web Services with SQL Server 2005 HTTP Endpoints
JavaOne 2005: Java Platform Roadmap Focuses on Ease of Development, Sun Focuses on the "Free" in F.O.S.S.
Wed Yourself to UML with the Power of Associations
Microsoft to Add AJAX Capabilities to ASP.NET
IBM's Cloudscape Versus MySQL
|
Bookmarks