[OT] Why that Ted guy is Annoyingly Esoteric

[Joe \Nuke Me Xemu\ Foster]

"Ted" <TTarney@hotmail.com> wrote in message <news:3b7434ac$1@news.devx.com>...

> To tell the truth Ivan, I really don't know what you were commenting about.
> Let me tell you how this turned out because you obviously weren't paying
> attention. You see, I asked a question about VB COM+ clients and C++ servers,
> and well with all the experts on VB here, only 2 people actually helped me
> solve it. The person that actually solved it was Joe. So how's that for
> ironic? Now, I am sure some didn't respond because they didn't know, but
> most probably said screw that Ted guy. Let him figure it out. But, after
> all of the bantering between Joe and I, he solved my problem. Hmmm. Didn't
> here from you and all your wisdom.

The real irony is that you needed the help of "some sniveling(yes VB devs)
crybaby who doesn't like the how increment and decrement are implemented"
"dumbass" who likes "a little girls language" and who's never even so much
as *seen* the COM spec! At least this "jerk off" "does one **** of a job
reading a ****ing book."

BTW, what's an HRESULT?

>=)

--
Joe Foster <mailto:jfoster@ricochet.net> On the cans? <http://www.xenu.net/>
WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above They're coming to
because my cats have apparently learned to type. take me away, ha ha!

[Zane Thomas]

Joe,

Will you ever learn? That sort of stuff isn't acceptable in this ng ...
take it to the off.ramp - I'm getting really tired of telling you that.


--
The nice thing about standards is that
there are so many of them to choose from.

[Observer]

zane@mabry.com (Zane Thomas) wrote:

>Will you ever learn? That sort of stuff isn't acceptable in this ng ...
>take it to the off.ramp - I'm getting really tired of telling you that.

Oh, yes, Pious-appearing, High-and-Mighty Section Leader Thomas is getting
tired of telling people that exactly what he does himself isn't acceptable
here and that they must to go to the off.ramp so he can tell them, once again,
to FOAD. What a crock -- both what you said and what you are.

[Zane Thomas]

"Observer" <sane@nauseated.net> wrote:

>Oh, yes, Pious-appearing, High-and-Mighty Section Leader Thomas ...

Personal attacks by anonymous nitwits are always good for a derisive
snicker.


--
The nice thing about standards is that
there are so many of them to choose from.

[Bruce]

Larry,

Be a man and put your name on your posts, especially if you're going to
flame somebody

Bruce

"Observer" <sane@nauseated.net> wrote in message
news:3b75bfeb$1@news.devx.com...
>
> zane@mabry.com (Zane Thomas) wrote:
>
> >Will you ever learn? That sort of stuff isn't acceptable in this ng ...
> >take it to the off.ramp - I'm getting really tired of telling you that.
>
> Oh, yes, Pious-appearing, High-and-Mighty Section Leader Thomas is getting
> tired of telling people that exactly what he does himself isn't acceptable
> here and that they must to go to the off.ramp so he can tell them, once
again,
> to FOAD. What a crock -- both what you said and what you are.

[Ted]

Ok jerk off. Ya see, you really didn't solve ****. I kind of just gave your
ego a little jump there. Being the VB guru( and every other thing ) couldn't
you tell me the difference with CreateObject and new in COM/COM+. I mean
there is a difference isn't there? I thought you could tell me.


"Joe \"Nuke Me Xemu\" Foster" <joe@bftsi0.UUCP> wrote:
>"Ted" <TTarney@hotmail.com> wrote in message <news:3b7434ac$1@news.devx.com>...
>
>> To tell the truth Ivan, I really don't know what you were commenting about.
>> Let me tell you how this turned out because you obviously weren't paying
>> attention. You see, I asked a question about VB COM+ clients and C++
servers,
>> and well with all the experts on VB here, only 2 people actually helped
me
>> solve it. The person that actually solved it was Joe. So how's that
for
>> ironic? Now, I am sure some didn't respond because they didn't know,
but
>> most probably said screw that Ted guy. Let him figure it out. But, after
>> all of the bantering between Joe and I, he solved my problem. Hmmm.
Didn't
>> here from you and all your wisdom.
>
>The real irony is that you needed the help of "some sniveling(yes VB devs)
>crybaby who doesn't like the how increment and decrement are implemented"
>"dumbass" who likes "a little girls language" and who's never even so much
>as *seen* the COM spec! At least this "jerk off" "does one **** of a job
>reading a ****ing book."
>
>BTW, what's an HRESULT?
>
>>=)
>
>--
>Joe Foster <mailto:jfoster@ricochet.net> On the cans? <http://www.xenu.net/>
>WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above They're coming
to
>because my cats have apparently learned to type. take me away,
ha ha!
>
>

[Ted]

>The real irony is that you needed the help of "some sniveling(yes VB devs)
>crybaby who doesn't like the how increment and decrement are implemented"
>"dumbass" who likes "a little girls language" and who's never even so much
>as *seen* the COM spec!

Hey, you said it not me. You don't like how increment and decremented are
implemented? For what objects?

>At least this "jerk off" "does one **** of a job reading a ****ing book."

What the **** are you mumbling about?

>BTW, what's an HRESULT?

Hey I think I posed that to you months ago. Still waiting on the ATL thing
though.

Admit it Joe, you know **** about COM.

[Zane Thomas]

Bruce,

ROFL, when did they start putting "X-User-Info: 4.41.203.236 4.41.203.236"
in the headers? :-)


--
The nice thing about standards is that
there are so many of them to choose from.

[Zane Thomas]

"Observer" <sane@nauseated.net> (aka Larry Linson) wrote:

Take it to the off.ramp bub, I know you know where that's at.


--
The nice thing about standards is that
there are so many of them to choose from.

[Zane Thomas]

Larry,

Btw, I moved your most recent off-topic post to the off.ramp and I'll
continue moving them as long as you need to have them moved.


--
The nice thing about standards is that
there are so many of them to choose from.

[Exposed]

"Bruce" <no@spam> wrote:

> Be a man and put your name on your posts,
> especially if you're going to
> flame somebody

I just dropped in, via the online interface, to update the comments from
people in my UG. Not so amazingly, I noted that His Eminent Section Leadership
hadn't had any change of heart and was harrassing my "triplet brother" (as
described by one of the Band of Zealots). I thought the name and e-mail appropriate
to the comment I made.

And, it's not like it took much detective work to compare the two IPs, is
it? Unless of course, you didn't start with "nearby" posts, but searched
the whole universe of those who hold Zane in similar regard.

Because I'm using a descriptive name this time, too, and I wouldn't want
either of you to have to go to that minimal amount of detective work again,
I'll sign this one.

Larry Linson

[Craig Clearman]

Hi Zane,

>ROFL, when did they start putting "X-User-Info: 4.41.203.236 4.41.203.236"
>in the headers? :-)

Anything that comes from the web interface gets the X-User-Info tag, as the
NNTP-Posting-Host tag, by necessity, must be the web server.

Ciao, Craig