-
interesting point/counterpoint
I just got around to reading a point/counterpoint that is running on one of the portal sites (sponsored editorial--not my area) but anyway ...
I've never been terribly interested in chip architecture issues but I did find this a pretty interesting debate:
Author #1 (an Intel dude, natch) says developers will continue to write applications with a single-process architecture at great peril. The sky may not be falling but time for change is right away. After awhile, single-core machines won't be sold anymore.
Author #2 says there's plenty of time; there's forking techniques, etc. People who are moving now are primarily doing so because it's new and cool.
It's a pretty big change that has to be made. Is anybody out there worried about this? Who is right?
Lori
Similar Threads
-
By scorpiopank in forum Java
Replies: 7
Last Post: 09-23-2006, 11:26 PM
-
By Greg Brunet in forum .NET
Replies: 48
Last Post: 08-12-2002, 10:12 PM
-
Replies: 0
Last Post: 04-23-2002, 12:16 AM
-
By zac in forum VB Classic
Replies: 0
Last Post: 12-19-2000, 06:26 PM
-
By Jack Q W Cantwell in forum VB Classic
Replies: 1
Last Post: 08-31-2000, 05:29 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
Top DevX Stories
Easy Web Services with SQL Server 2005 HTTP Endpoints
JavaOne 2005: Java Platform Roadmap Focuses on Ease of Development, Sun Focuses on the "Free" in F.O.S.S.
Wed Yourself to UML with the Power of Associations
Microsoft to Add AJAX Capabilities to ASP.NET
IBM's Cloudscape Versus MySQL
|
Bookmarks