Re: ODBC Connection
That helps out a bunch! I really appreciate the time you have taken to explain
everything. I'll have the firewall ports checked out. I think since it's
a new server it might not have been added to the appropriate access control
list yet - allowing the passthrough you mention.
Again, I appreciate the help.
"Q*bert" <email@example.com> wrote:
>I assume your IIS server is sitting in the DMZ and that your SQL server
>sitting inside your network. Is it possible that your Firewall is not setup
>to allow access through the appropriate ports?
>A typicall secure network would have Diagram like the below
> INTERNET (The World)
>EXTERNAL COMPANY FIREWALL }
> IIS, Terminal Server, Others } DMZ (Demillitarized zone
> | }
>Public Address Scheme (!10.x.x.x and !192.168.x.x)
>INTERNAL COMPANY FIREWALL
>Private address Scheme (10.x.x.x or 192.168.x.x)
> SQL Server
> Domain Controller
> APPLICATION SERVER
> FILE SERVER
> Terminal Servers etc
>Now based on that design, your IIS server would need to be allowed through
>the Internal Company Firewall for the appropriate ports, have to look them
>up on the web if you don't know. Or, allow all(requests from the IP address
>of your IIS Server (bad design as if anyone hacks your IIS server, they
>then gain access to your internal network(all ports) allowing Just port
>80 and the one for SQL connections would be enough))
>Named Pipes, in this case I believe, will not work as it would have to pass
>through the firewall. Since it(I believe) is a non-routable protocol, it
>would not be able to get through.
>If your network design is not this complex, then Check to see if there the
>SQL servers and IIS server are part of the appropriate domains. If not,
>fix that. Some simple things to check are
>1) can your IIS server PING your SQL server(s), if not you have a network
>2) If they can ping, can you authenticate to them using local user accounts?
>3) if that works, are the ports on the server setup to allow incomming traffic
>from all hosts?
>4) Is there a problem with your configuration of the LMHosts file?
>Last, if the web sever is expected to get lots of traffic (more than 1000
>users at a time), you might consider DSN-less connections over the ODBC
>as you will have a slight performance gain around the 1000th user. This
>of course assumes you can use DSN-less connections.
>Don't know if this helped or not. But at least I made you think about the
>security of your network and the data on it.
>"Terry" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>We have just installed a new server that is supposed to function primarily
>>as an IIS server. I am experiencing a few problems configuring ODBC connections
>>from this IIS server to our database servers. I am able to make an ODBC
>>connection to an old SQL 6.5 box only after mapping a drive from this new
>>IIS server to the drive where the 6.5 MASTER db resides, and I cannot connect
>>at all to our new 2000 SQL box. The error I'm getting is
>>SQL Server Error: 1326
>>[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][Named Pipes]ConnectionOpen (CreateFile()).
>>SQL Server Error: 1326
>>[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]Client unable to establish connection"
>>We are running two named instances on the new SQL 2000 server without any
>>default instance installed. I have tried to connect both with named pipes
>>How do you update the SQL Server ODBC driver? It may be out of date.
>>Does anyone have any ideas what may be causing this problem?
Top DevX Stories
Easy Web Services with SQL Server 2005 HTTP Endpoints
JavaOne 2005: Java Platform Roadmap Focuses on Ease of Development, Sun Focuses on the "Free" in F.O.S.S.
Wed Yourself to UML with the Power of Associations
Microsoft to Add AJAX Capabilities to ASP.NET
IBM's Cloudscape Versus MySQL