-
Which is better to learn
I'm planning to take MCSD exams so which is better to learn:
VB & VC++ or VB & Java or VC++ & Java.(I mean for real world applications
which are widely required)
-
Re: Which is better to learn
vb & Java
"Abdullah" <abboud11@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:39f5b9c2$1@news.devx.com...
>
> I'm planning to take MCSD exams so which is better to learn:
> VB & VC++ or VB & Java or VC++ & Java.(I mean for real world applications
> which are widely required)
-
Re: Which is better to learn
try to learn a little flavor of all of them..since you will likely use them
all.. good luck!
--ae
<Mike@cranburygolf.com> wrote:
>vb & Java
>"Abdullah" <abboud11@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:39f5b9c2$1@news.devx.com...
>>
>> I'm planning to take MCSD exams so which is better to learn:
>> VB & VC++ or VB & Java or VC++ & Java.(I mean for real world applications
>> which are widely required)
>
>
-
Re: Which is better to learn
Abdullah,
Hello. For the past six years, I have worked with VC++ and VB professionally.
At this point, I would not waste any time learning VB 6 or VC++ 6.
VB, as it is known in version 6.0, is going away. It is being replaced by
VB.NET; this has a completely different framework and component architecture.
The alpha is out for VB.NET, however, at this point, it is a command line
compiler.
Another part of the .NET architecture, C#, is the "premier development tool"
according to MS. This is the tool they seem to be encouraging C/C++ developers
to use. It seems VC++, according to the MS vision, will be used only for
low level programming.
Since both tools are out in alpha testing, I would recommend becoming a Java
guru. After that, if you want, you could see how the .NET tools turned out.
Rich
--------------------------------------------------------------
"Abdullah" <abboud11@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>I'm planning to take MCSD exams so which is better to learn:
>VB & VC++ or VB & Java or VC++ & Java.(I mean for real world applications
>which are widely required)
-
Re: Which is better to learn
This is exactly the tact that I have been taking. I am a MCSD use VB, ASP
and some VC++, but am spending off hours digging through Java.
Scott
"Rich" <cbuilder@NOSPAMhotbot.com> wrote in message
news:39f81ff8$1@news.devx.com...
>
> Abdullah,
>
> Hello. For the past six years, I have worked with VC++ and VB
professionally.
> At this point, I would not waste any time learning VB 6 or VC++ 6.
>
> VB, as it is known in version 6.0, is going away. It is being replaced by
> VB.NET; this has a completely different framework and component
architecture.
> The alpha is out for VB.NET, however, at this point, it is a command line
> compiler.
>
> Another part of the .NET architecture, C#, is the "premier development
tool"
> according to MS. This is the tool they seem to be encouraging C/C++
developers
> to use. It seems VC++, according to the MS vision, will be used only for
> low level programming.
>
> Since both tools are out in alpha testing, I would recommend becoming a
Java
> guru. After that, if you want, you could see how the .NET tools turned
out.
>
> Rich
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "Abdullah" <abboud11@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >I'm planning to take MCSD exams so which is better to learn:
> >VB & VC++ or VB & Java or VC++ & Java.(I mean for real world applications
> >which are widely required)
>
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
Top DevX Stories
Easy Web Services with SQL Server 2005 HTTP Endpoints
JavaOne 2005: Java Platform Roadmap Focuses on Ease of Development, Sun Focuses on the "Free" in F.O.S.S.
Wed Yourself to UML with the Power of Associations
Microsoft to Add AJAX Capabilities to ASP.NET
IBM's Cloudscape Versus MySQL
|
Bookmarks