DevX Home    Today's Headlines   Articles Archive   Tip Bank   Forums   

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Joe Guest

    California Overtime


    I am under the impression that the rule for overtime after 40 hours is a FEDERAL
    wage and salary regulation. Any statute passed by California could only
    apply to State and (perhaps) municipal employees. Also note that the definition
    of who receives overtime depends on whether their position is classified,
    again by the Federal government, as "Exempt". The "Exempt" definition has
    a lot of nuances but basically means working without supervision on intellectual
    type stuff. Engineers usually qualify as exempt and the last I heard (some
    years ago) they were still debating whether computer folks could fall into
    this category. The feds are VERY strict about this stuff at large companies
    (e.g. Boeing).



  2. #2
    Robert C. Cain Guest

    Re: California Overtime

    I don't know about California, but here in Alabama if you make more than 26
    dollars an hour (last I heard) that you are considered a "highly
    compensated" employee, and your company is no longer required to pay you
    "time and a half" for overtime work. Also, if you are classified as
    Salaried, companies are not required to pay OT no matter what your wage
    works out to be hourly.

    As a consultant, most of my time is billable. I am fortunate that even
    though I'm considered salaried, my company (Comsys) pays me overtime at the
    same scale as I get paid normally. I admit I rather like getting paid for my
    overtime, since most permanent positions I've seen you get paid flat salary
    but wind up working 45-50 hour weeks.

    I'm sort of curious about the ratio of consultants to permanent workers
    participate here. Might also be a good question to include in the next VBPJ
    salary article.

    Robert

    "Joe" <jmcgough@mssa.com> wrote in message news:398eb85e$1@news.devx.com...
    >
    > I am under the impression that the rule for overtime after 40 hours is a

    FEDERAL
    > wage and salary regulation. Any statute passed by California could only
    > apply to State and (perhaps) municipal employees. Also note that the

    definition
    > of who receives overtime depends on whether their position is classified,
    > again by the Federal government, as "Exempt". The "Exempt" definition has
    > a lot of nuances but basically means working without supervision on

    intellectual
    > type stuff. Engineers usually qualify as exempt and the last I heard

    (some
    > years ago) they were still debating whether computer folks could fall into
    > this category. The feds are VERY strict about this stuff at large

    companies
    > (e.g. Boeing).
    >
    >




  3. #3
    Martin Colloby Guest

    Re: California Overtime

    > I don't know about California, but here in Alabama if you make more than
    26
    > dollars an hour (last I heard) that you are considered a "highly
    > compensated" employee, and your company is no longer required to pay you
    > "time and a half" for overtime work.


    In California at the moment it is time and a half across the board
    regardless of the hourly rate. Yet another example of politicians
    legislating to help the less well off and catching everyone else in the net.
    As a result, nobody I know is working any overtime unless absolutely
    necessary. Hopefully they will soon be adopting the approach that you have
    in Alabama.

    Martin Colloby



  4. #4
    Craig Clearman Guest

    Re: California Overtime

    Martin,

    >As a result, nobody I know is working any overtime unless absolutely
    >necessary. Hopefully they will soon be adopting the approach that you have
    >in Alabama.


    Am I understanding you correctly that you *want* people to do overtime
    routinely? Why?

    Ciao, Craig


  5. #5
    Robert C. Cain Guest

    Re: California Overtime


    "Craig Clearman" <chclear@nospam.please> wrote in message
    news:j700psc9niihed9m0ojhdp93sk44b596se@4ax.com...
    > >As a result, nobody I know is working any overtime unless absolutely
    > >necessary. Hopefully they will soon be adopting the approach that you

    have
    > >in Alabama.

    >
    > Am I understanding you correctly that you *want* people to do overtime
    > routinely? Why?


    I don't think he meant that he wanted people to HAVE to work OT, but wanted
    people to have the ability to work OT and get paid for it, if they wanted. I
    routinely work OT because I want to, and I get paid for it. It's a great way
    to pick up extra bucks to pay down bills, or fund special items that
    normally wouldn't fit in the budget.

    Robert



  6. #6
    Martin Colloby Guest

    Re: California Overtime

    > Am I understanding you correctly that you *want* people to do overtime
    > routinely? Why?


    No, I want to have the chance to do some overtime every now and then because
    I need the money!

    Seriously, until three months ago I was a freelance consultant in the UK,
    billing around 80-90 hours per week. Now I've relocated to CA, and I can't
    work more than 40 hours per week at my new job because of this regulation.
    There is plenty of work to do, and I could easily work 60 hours of my own
    free will, but the option is not open to me.

    Martin Colloby



  7. #7
    Martin Colloby Guest

    Re: California Overtime

    > I don't think he meant that he wanted people to HAVE to work OT, but
    wanted
    > people to have the ability to work OT and get paid for it, if they wanted.

    I
    > routinely work OT because I want to, and I get paid for it. It's a great

    way
    > to pick up extra bucks to pay down bills, or fund special items that
    > normally wouldn't fit in the budget.


    Absolutely spot on!

    Martin Colloby



  8. #8
    BettyB Guest

    Re: California Overtime

    I have been working in Ca as a programmer since 1966. I have always been a
    corporate slave, salaried, and exempt ("from the rights and privileges of
    being paid for my work"). I have worked on projects which averaged 22 hours
    a day, 7 days a week for months on end, and others that were 18-24 hours a
    day, 7 days a week for almost two years. I have never been paid overtime.
    Comp time has been either zero or one or two days at the end of the project.

    BettyB.


    Martin Colloby wrote in message <3990cb89@news.devx.com>...
    >> Am I understanding you correctly that you *want* people to do overtime
    >> routinely? Why?

    >
    >No, I want to have the chance to do some overtime every now and then

    because
    >I need the money!
    >
    >Seriously, until three months ago I was a freelance consultant in the UK,
    >billing around 80-90 hours per week. Now I've relocated to CA, and I can't
    >work more than 40 hours per week at my new job because of this regulation.
    >There is plenty of work to do, and I could easily work 60 hours of my own
    >free will, but the option is not open to me.
    >
    >Martin Colloby
    >
    >




  9. #9
    Cindy Winegarden Guest

    Re: California Overtime

    Overtime also helps companies. If they had to hire more workers they would
    have to pay for desk space and benefits. Lots of times they can just get
    their current employees to take up the slack, and pay them overtime.
    Cheaper that way.

    --


    Cindy Winegarden
    Microsoft Certified Professional, Visual FoxPro

    Duke Children's Information Systems
    Duke University Medical Center
    cindyw@duke.edu



    "Robert C. Cain" <robert.cain@comsys.com> wrote in message
    news:39901af0@news.devx.com...
    |
    | "Craig Clearman" <chclear@nospam.please> wrote in message
    | news:j700psc9niihed9m0ojhdp93sk44b596se@4ax.com...
    | > >As a result, nobody I know is working any overtime unless absolutely
    | > >necessary. Hopefully they will soon be adopting the approach that you
    | have
    | > >in Alabama.
    | >
    | > Am I understanding you correctly that you *want* people to do overtime
    | > routinely? Why?
    |
    | I don't think he meant that he wanted people to HAVE to work OT, but
    wanted
    | people to have the ability to work OT and get paid for it, if they wanted.
    I
    | routinely work OT because I want to, and I get paid for it. It's a great
    way
    | to pick up extra bucks to pay down bills, or fund special items that
    | normally wouldn't fit in the budget.
    |
    | Robert
    |
    |



  10. #10
    Robert C. Cain Guest

    Re: California Overtime

    Betty,

    Sounds like it's time for a job change! Perhaps you should get into a job
    (such as consulting) where your skills and time are more appreciated, not to
    mention compensated for.

    Previously I worked for a manufacturing facility. Now, the people were
    pretty nice, and the environment was OK (even had my own office with it's
    own coffee/tea pot). However, I routinely had to work 45 to 50 hours a week,
    often put in much more than that. I also got called in during the night
    since I was it for PC Tech support (in addition to network support and chief
    PC programmer). After a while, I decided to get paid for my efforts and got
    a job consulting, where I get paid for all my overtime. Much happier now!

    Robert

    "BettyB" <bettyb@flamingo-code.com> wrote in message
    news:39918ea6$1@news.devx.com...
    > I have been working in Ca as a programmer since 1966. I have always been

    a
    > corporate slave, salaried, and exempt ("from the rights and privileges of
    > being paid for my work"). I have worked on projects which averaged 22

    hours
    > a day, 7 days a week for months on end, and others that were 18-24 hours a
    > day, 7 days a week for almost two years. I have never been paid overtime.
    > Comp time has been either zero or one or two days at the end of the

    project.
    >
    > BettyB.
    >
    >
    > Martin Colloby wrote in message <3990cb89@news.devx.com>...
    > >> Am I understanding you correctly that you *want* people to do overtime
    > >> routinely? Why?

    > >
    > >No, I want to have the chance to do some overtime every now and then

    > because
    > >I need the money!
    > >
    > >Seriously, until three months ago I was a freelance consultant in the UK,
    > >billing around 80-90 hours per week. Now I've relocated to CA, and I

    can't
    > >work more than 40 hours per week at my new job because of this

    regulation.
    > >There is plenty of work to do, and I could easily work 60 hours of my own
    > >free will, but the option is not open to me.
    > >
    > >Martin Colloby
    > >
    > >

    >
    >




  11. #11
    Jo Desmet Guest

    Re: California Overtime

    BettyB, Get a life!!



  12. #12
    Dan Nuttle Guest

    Re: California Overtime


    I've worked a job since 342 B.C., I put in over 12,000 hours a day, and I
    haven't eaten more than once a decade, and they make me put giant mean rats
    in my pockets, and wear sunglasses in a dark room, with a car horn honking
    constantly, and the coffee is some generic brand from a former Soviet republic
    that tastes like guano, and I have a really big heavy anvil strapped onto
    my head because they can't find any other place to put it.

    And it hurts.

  13. #13
    Larry Triezenberg Guest

    Re: California Overtime

    At least you're fulfilled in your life's ambition...

    Dan Nuttle wrote in message <399afe70@news.devx.com>...
    >
    >I've worked a job since 342 B.C., I put in over 12,000 hours a day, and I
    >haven't eaten more than once a decade, and they make me put giant mean rats
    >in my pockets, and wear sunglasses in a dark room, with a car horn honking
    >constantly, and the coffee is some generic brand from a former Soviet

    republic
    >that tastes like guano, and I have a really big heavy anvil strapped onto
    >my head because they can't find any other place to put it.
    >
    >And it hurts.



Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
HTML5 Development Center
 
 
FAQ
Latest Articles
Java
.NET
XML
Database
Enterprise
Questions? Contact us.
C++
Web Development
Wireless
Latest Tips
Open Source


Top DevX Stories

Easy Web Services with SQL Server 2005 HTTP Endpoints
JavaOne 2005: Java Platform Roadmap Focuses on Ease of Development, Sun Focuses on the "Free" in F.O.S.S.
Wed Yourself to UML with the Power of Associations
Microsoft to Add AJAX Capabilities to ASP.NET
IBM's Cloudscape Versus MySQL


Sponsored Links