Interviews: Peeking Under the Lid of Open Source .NET CLI Implementations


DevX Home    Today's Headlines   Articles Archive   Tip Bank   Forums   

Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Interviews: Peeking Under the Lid of Open Source .NET CLI Implementations

  1. #1
    Russell Jones Guest

    Interviews: Peeking Under the Lid of Open Source .NET CLI Implementations

    Cross-platform .NET development is imminent, but the purpose, feature set,
    and platform support varies. We were curious about the development of the
    various open source implementations of Microsoft .NET's Common Language
    Runtime, so we talked to the key developers in charge of Mono, Rotor, and
    Portable .NET-to find out what they've built, how they did it, and how they
    compare. What we found might surprise you. Read the interviews here:
    http://www.devx.com/free/hotlinks/20...te061902-1.asp



  2. #2
    Patrick Troughton Guest

    Re: Interviews: Peeking Under the Lid of Open Source .NET CLI Implementations


    <quote>
    Q. What programming language(s) are you using for your implementation?
    Mono's de Icaza:
    Mostly Cobol, especially for the JIT engine.
    </quote>

    Cobol? Is that a typo?

    /Pat

    "Russell Jones" <arj1@nospam.northstate.net> wrote:
    >Cross-platform .NET development is imminent, but the purpose, feature set,
    >and platform support varies. We were curious about the development of the
    >various open source implementations of Microsoft .NET's Common Language
    >Runtime, so we talked to the key developers in charge of Mono, Rotor, and
    >Portable .NET-to find out what they've built, how they did it, and how they
    >compare. What we found might surprise you. Read the interviews here:
    >http://www.devx.com/free/hotlinks/20...te061902-1.asp
    >
    >



  3. #3
    Phil Weber Guest

    Re: Interviews: Peeking Under the Lid of Open Source .NET CLI Implementations

    > Cobol? Is that a typo?

    ....or a joke. ;-)
    ---
    Phil Weber



  4. #4
    Bob Guest

    Re: Interviews: Peeking Under the Lid of Open Source .NET CLI Implementations

    In article <3d11f7cc$1@10.1.10.29>, Patrick@Troughton.com says...
    >
    > <quote>
    > Q. What programming language(s) are you using for your implementation?
    > Mono's de Icaza:
    > Mostly Cobol, especially for the JIT engine.
    > </quote>
    >
    > Cobol? Is that a typo?
    >
    > /Pat
    >

    I'd say it's humor.

    Bob

  5. #5
    MarkN Guest

    Re: Interviews: Peeking Under the Lid of Open Source .NET CLI Implementations


    Bob <no@spam.com> wrote:
    >In article <3d11f7cc$1@10.1.10.29>, Patrick@Troughton.com says...
    >>
    >> <quote>
    >> Q. What programming language(s) are you using for your implementation?


    >> Mono's de Icaza:
    >> Mostly Cobol, especially for the JIT engine.
    >> </quote>
    >>
    >> Cobol? Is that a typo?
    >>
    >> /Pat
    >>

    >I'd say it's humor.
    >
    >Bob


    I would say the whole article was humor.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
HTML5 Development Center
 
 
FAQ
Latest Articles
Java
.NET
XML
Database
Enterprise
Questions? Contact us.
C++
Web Development
Wireless
Latest Tips
Open Source


   Development Centers

   -- Android Development Center
   -- Cloud Development Project Center
   -- HTML5 Development Center
   -- Windows Mobile Development Center