-
.NET Deployment PC hardware and OS requirements (was: I don't like VB NET, is too slow....)
The requirements of the deployment machine are of greater concern to me than
the requirements of the dev machine. How big is the .NET framework
"runtime" and what sort of RAM and processor will be required on end-users'
PCs in order to attain performance comparable to a competently-written
pure-VB6 application? Will .NET work on Win98, or is the expectation that
end users will have to upgrade to Win2000?
Thanks
Tim Romano
www.aimsdata.com/tim
"Jay Glynn" <jay_glynn@agla.com> wrote in message
news:3a9406ac@news.devx.com...
> Zane,
>
> Haha gotcha beat. My production machine is a dual 866 with 512. Haven't
> loaded VS.NET on it yet, I'll wait for Beta2 and then maybe load it, but
VB6
> sure does run nice, and Lotus Notes (groan) is even tolerable ;-).
>
>
> >
> > Runs even finer with dual 750s and 512mb of ram. It's a rare moment
when
> > I can use all the ram or max out the two processors - although I'm sure
> > that will change in a few years. :-)
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Ice Z - Straight Outta Redmond
>
> --
> Jay Glynn
> Introducing .NET
> ISBN: 1861004893
> Wrox Press Ltd.
>
>
-
Re: .NET Deployment PC hardware and OS requirements (was: I don't like VB NET, is too slow....)
> The requirements of the deployment machine are of greater concern to me
than
> the requirements of the dev machine.
And rightfully so.
> How big is the .NET framework "runtime"
Rumblings are that the redistributable will be in the 15-20Mb ballpark.
> and what sort of RAM and processor will be required on end-users'
> PCs in order to attain performance comparable to a competently-written
> pure-VB6 application?
Educated wild guess: +8-12Mb, same processor.
> Will .NET work on Win98, or is the expectation that
> end users will have to upgrade to Win2000?
..NET applications should run on all Win32 implementations.
-
Re: .NET Deployment PC hardware and OS requirements (was: I don't like VB NET, is too slow....)
Tim,
I have over 5000 PII 233 with 32 meg of ram and I asked if I could expect to
run a .NET app on these machines, and each time I have asked the reply was
yes. I will be the first to admit that a ram upgrade is in need for these
machines regardless, but when Beta2 arrives, this will be something that is
tested. You can deploy on 98.
"Tim Romano" <tim_romano@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3a95181e$1@news.devx.com...
> The requirements of the deployment machine are of greater concern to me
than
> the requirements of the dev machine. How big is the .NET framework
> "runtime" and what sort of RAM and processor will be required on
end-users'
> PCs in order to attain performance comparable to a competently-written
> pure-VB6 application? Will .NET work on Win98, or is the expectation that
> end users will have to upgrade to Win2000?
>
> Thanks
> Tim Romano
> www.aimsdata.com/tim
--
Jay Glynn
Introducing .NET
ISBN: 1861004893
Wrox Press Ltd.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
Top DevX Stories
Easy Web Services with SQL Server 2005 HTTP Endpoints
JavaOne 2005: Java Platform Roadmap Focuses on Ease of Development, Sun Focuses on the "Free" in F.O.S.S.
Wed Yourself to UML with the Power of Associations
Microsoft to Add AJAX Capabilities to ASP.NET
IBM's Cloudscape Versus MySQL
|
Bookmarks