VB.NET

[John Q]

Why MS Has to Compete when it has MKT Share on AP'S What it needs to prove
with VB.NET! All needs to is Simply UPGRADE Ver. of VB.6 Why not VB.2K

[Rob Teixeira]

There are about an average of 60 posts a day on this NG going back to last
summer trying to argue this very question
Keep reading!

-Rob

"John Q" <sewellgp@hotmaiil.com> wrote:
>
>
>Why MS Has to Compete when it has MKT Share on AP'S What it needs to prove
>with VB.NET! All needs to is Simply UPGRADE Ver. of VB.6 Why not VB.2K

[niraj]

Microsoft wants to prove the .NET(CLR reagarding languages). So, MS may go
to any extent to make a MS language/Tool .NET compatible.

"John Q" <sewellgp@hotmaiil.com> wrote:
>
>
>Why MS Has to Compete when it has MKT Share on AP'S What it needs to prove
>with VB.NET! All needs to is Simply UPGRADE Ver. of VB.6 Why not VB.2K

[Joe \Nuke Me Xemu\ Foster]

"John Q" <sewellgp@hotmaiil.com> wrote in message <news:3ab37c6e$1@news.devx.com>...

> Why MS Has to Compete when it has MKT Share on AP'S What it needs to prove
> with VB.NET! All needs to is Simply UPGRADE Ver. of VB.6 Why not VB.2K

Because companies MS sees as competitors are finally comfortable with COM?

--
Joe Foster <mailto:jfoster@ricochet.net> "Regged" again? <http://www.xenu.net/>
WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above They're coming to
because my cats have apparently learned to type. take me away, ha ha!

[Mark Burns]

"Joe "Nuke Me Xemu" Foster" <joe@bftsi0.UUCP> wrote in message
news:3ab3ddce@news.devx.com...
> Because companies MS sees as competitors are finally comfortable with COM?

ROFL! Good one!