Patrick,
You've missed my point entirely. I am not making the assertion that
applications will have a three-year lifespan. I am making the assertion that
Microsoft wants us to start thinking in terms of applications having a
shorter lifespan. Do you see the difference? This is a marketing stratagem.
Microsoft seeking to bend minds and set expectations with respect to ROI.
Do you see why I said that you had not read my original message carefully
when your reply was to say that *I* was exaggerating, and that applications
will have a longer lifespan?

Tim Romano

Patrick Troughton wrote:

> That the lifespan of an application, either now or in the forseeable
future,
> would only be three years is inaccurrate.
>
> > How can a lifespan be inaccurate?
>
> It would be inaccurate in the sense that it's erroneous.
>
> /Pat
>
>