DevX Home    Today's Headlines   Articles Archive   Tip Bank   Forums   

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Richardb Guest

    .Net Architecture


    Would it be worthwhile having a .Net architecture discussion group?

  2. #2
    Phil Weber Guest

    Re: .Net Architecture

    > Would it be worthwhile having a .NET architecture
    > discussion group?


    Richard: What would you discuss in such a group?
    ---
    Phil Weber



  3. #3
    Joe \Nuke Me Xemu\ Foster Guest

    Re: .Net Architecture

    "Richardb" <rbuckingham@loyalty-magic.com> wrote in message <news:3b8b2308$1@news.devx.com>...

    > Would it be worthwhile having a .Net architecture discussion group?


    That would be the C# groups, since B# is obviously only a temporary
    transition language. Microsoft Basic is dead. Sure, the corpse is
    still twitching, but that's just the Maggots.NET.

    --
    Joe Foster <mailto:jlfoster%40znet.com> Space Cooties! <http://www.xenu.net/>
    WARNING: I cannot be held responsible for the above They're coming to
    because my cats have apparently learned to type. take me away, ha ha!



Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
HTML5 Development Center
 
 
FAQ
Latest Articles
Java
.NET
XML
Database
Enterprise
Questions? Contact us.
C++
Web Development
Wireless
Latest Tips
Open Source


Top DevX Stories

Easy Web Services with SQL Server 2005 HTTP Endpoints
JavaOne 2005: Java Platform Roadmap Focuses on Ease of Development, Sun Focuses on the "Free" in F.O.S.S.
Wed Yourself to UML with the Power of Associations
Microsoft to Add AJAX Capabilities to ASP.NET
IBM's Cloudscape Versus MySQL


Sponsored Links