More on Visual J#.Net

[Jay Glynn]

Geez Michael chill out. I haven't won anything nor do I claim to.

If you haven't noticed, everyones universe just got realigned. I chose to
make the best of it, some are choosing not to. That is not my fault.


"Michael (michka) Kaplan" <former_mvp@spamfree.trigeminal.nospam.com> wrote
in message news:3bcfb457$1@news.devx.com...
>
> "Jay Glynn" <jlsglynn@hotmail.com> wrote...
>
> > >really don't care what names you give me. But I know what I see and I
> > >know what Microsoft has done to classic VB.
> >
> > Yeah, they finally fixed it ;-).
>
> Jay,
>
> There is no need to be quite this rude. You win, okay? Are you the type of
> person who just gets so much raw pleasure out of the misfortune of others?
>
> If not, then lets try to be kind to the people that have trouble with the
> universe being realigned on them?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --
> MichKa
>
> Michael Kaplan
> (principal developer of the MSLU)
> Trigeminal Software, Inc. -- http://www.trigeminal.com/
> the book -- http://www.i18nWithVB.com/
>
>

[Aaron Sevivas]

>Why don't you go write some books on migration from VB6? Certainly this
>would be more productive.
<LOL>hehe</LOL>

[Jay Glynn]

*** is up your butt?? Like your the perfect little angel and haven't posted
a sarcastic or stinging comment before. I poke a little fun at someone, something
that I don't do all that often and your panties are all up in a wad. Maybe
you should look at you own post to Mr Mitchell a few days ago, I quote

***
So I guess you really do not know much about VB or COM, do you? Thats ok,
its been obvious you are a Delphi nut, anyway -- kind of nice that you are
here to remind us how silly the lot of you are....
***

Now do you want to talk about rude. Give it a rest Michael. I've got over
half a million lines of VB 6 code to deal with as well. So is it wrong for
me to make the best out of the situation, or should I sit around and whine
and pout.

>
>You are just the one who enoys rubbing it in your spare time, thats all.
:-)
>
>Why don't you go write some books on migration from VB6? Certainly this
>would be more productive.

[Zane Thomas]

On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 06:06:06 -0700, "Michael \(michka\) Kaplan"
<former_mvp@spamfree.trigeminal.nospam.com> wrote:

>You are just the one who enoys rubbing it in your spare time, thats all. :-)

Where'd that holier-than-thou attitude come from all of a sudden? In case
you missed it, there have been a couple of zealous anti-ms nutz hanging
out here making a mess of the newsgroup for months now.


--
The nice thing about standards is that
there are so many of them to choose from.

[W.E. (Bill) Goodrich, PhD]

In article <MPG.1637b99620e3b7e3989697@news.devx.com>,
Michael Bennett <mikey0131@mac.com> writes:

> In article <3bcdcab4@news.devx.com>, jason@creative_nospam_corp.com
> says...

[...]

> Doesn't .Net have a security context which controls what assemblies
> can run under what circumstances?

A thin one. So did NT4 and W2K. But that did not stop the problems
that happened under them.

> Isn't this applicable to remote installations?

Yes.

> Isn't this security mechanism based on a 128 bit GUID?

Yes - a single, easily compromized password.

> Isn't Mr. Goodrich's *perception* problem

The perceptions I spoke of come from a variety of sources. But they
are really more of a problem for M$ than for me.

> based mostly on MSFT's previous bad press for IIS

And various OS bugs, etc. And the whole emphasis on transparent
remote installation.

> and not .NET.

..NET is not released yet. But things that were considered "secure
enough" two or three months ago no longer seem so.

--

W.E. (Bill) Goodrich, PhD

*-----------------------*--------------------------------------------*
* CHANGE YOUR SEXUALITY * http://www.nyx.net/~bgoodric/ctg.html *
* * *
* Without Aversive * ctgcentral@earthlink.net *
* Behavior Modification * Creative Technology Group *
* or Drugs * PO Box 286 *
* * Englewood, CO 80151-0286 *
*-----------------------*--------------------------------------------*