-
Re: Son of VB6 vs VB.NET...Procedure Calling Syntax
"Dan Barclay" <Dan@MVPs.org> wrote
> DoThisThing ((ProtectThisVar))
>
> Does this execute Sub DoThisThing and pass the value of ProtectThisVar
> in such a way that DoThisThing can't change it?
The Beta 2 version I have allows it as you say.
> Without thinking in the entire context of the language, they
> apparently took the 'most frequently asked questions' list and
> implemented what they could. There weren't any questions about this
> being a problem the other way because it wasn't a problem...yet.
Time will tell....
LFS
-
Re: Son of VB6 vs VB.NET...Procedure Calling Syntax
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002 20:17:44 -0500, "Larry Serflaten"
<serflaten@usinternet.com> wrote:
>
>I'd suspect that the intent was more about using the same parsing
>algorithms for user routines as they did with system calls. But you
>use their market speak as if it defined the language!
No, it was the implementation that defined the language. For whatever
reason, they defined it a certain way. The "market speak" you're
talking about was in the user doc and only told how to use what was
defined.
So, when they come up with the next bright idea you can rewrite your
code again (again).
Dan
Language Stability is a *feature* I wish VB had!
(#6)
Error 51
Error 3
Error 9
....
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
Top DevX Stories
Easy Web Services with SQL Server 2005 HTTP Endpoints
JavaOne 2005: Java Platform Roadmap Focuses on Ease of Development, Sun Focuses on the "Free" in F.O.S.S.
Wed Yourself to UML with the Power of Associations
Microsoft to Add AJAX Capabilities to ASP.NET
IBM's Cloudscape Versus MySQL
|
Bookmarks