Re: Microsoft's C++ bigotry
"Phil Weber" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
> Microsoft *is* worried about Java,
> which is why they updated VB to be able
> to compete with it on equal footing.
False. The corrected statement should be "which is why they developed C#."
For instance, if you take a look at this interview, you'll see that Anders
Hejlsberg talked almost exclusively about C# relative to Java.
As far as I can see, Java was not a consideration in the design of VB.NET,
except in that it was indirectly affected by the desire to maintain
consistency with C#. So Microsoft ended up (probably quite unintentionally)
with 2 Java-killers and no VB6 upgrade path. Brilliant strategy. Truly
Top DevX Stories
Easy Web Services with SQL Server 2005 HTTP Endpoints
JavaOne 2005: Java Platform Roadmap Focuses on Ease of Development, Sun Focuses on the "Free" in F.O.S.S.
Wed Yourself to UML with the Power of Associations
Microsoft to Add AJAX Capabilities to ASP.NET
IBM's Cloudscape Versus MySQL