Re: Microsoft's C++ bigotry
"Paul Clement" <UseAdddressAtEndofMessage@swspectrum.com> wrote in message
> On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 19:03:06 -0000, "Jonathan West" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> ¤ "Phil Weber" <email@example.com> wrote in message
> ¤ news:firstname.lastname@example.org...
> ¤ > > No, no! We need to get Microsoft to admit it!
> ¤ >
> ¤ > Mike: That's actually why I wrote the piece that started this thread.
> ¤ > going to use what little influence I have to try to get MS to make the
> ¤ > VB6-to-VB.NET transition more similar to the VC++-to-MC++ transition:
> ¤ > Just Works."
> ¤ >
> ¤ > If MS won't do it, I think there's a market for a third-party
> ¤ > wizard that does a better job.
> ¤ Microsoft will do it, if they perceive that the following three
> ¤ are met
> ¤ 1. Sales & usage figures are bad for VB.NET
> ¤ 2. They believe this is having a significant negative impact on the
> ¤ of success for the .NET platform overall.
> ¤ 3. They believe fixing it will retrieve the situation.
> ¤ I don't have access to Microsoft's sales figures, but I have been
> ¤ eye on newsgroup volumes in the dotnet groups on the msnews server,
> ¤ probably serve as a reasonable indication of usage. The C# groups have
> ¤ 50% more traffic than the VB.NET groups. I once took a look at a sample
> ¤ the posts on the framework groups, to see which languages were being
> ¤ more there, and the same ratio seemed to hold.
> Of course you're assuming that more posts mean higher popularity. That's
> oversimplification. It could mean instead that more folks need help with
C# than VB.NET.
That's true - but its not going to make an order-of-magnitude difference, so
the approximation is good enough. I've seen figures which suggest there are
(roughly) 10 times as many VB6 users as VC++ users, so if migration rates
from VB6 to VB.NET were even remotely comparable to those of C+= to C#, we
should be seeing the VB.NET volumes completely swamping the C# volumes. It
In any case, even in the language groups, most of the questions involve the
use of the new elements in the framework, both for C# and VB.NET. Since the
framework is common to both, there's no particular reason to ascribe the
higher posting rate in the C# groups to the idea that C# is more difficult
to use. After all, other things being equal, C# ought to be *easier* to use
with the framework, since they were designed for each other.
> After all
> that is the purpose for posting a question in the first place. You have to
consider other factors.
> ASP.NET uses both VB.NET and C# so you may want to eval the posts there as
I already did. To +/- 10% or so, the ratio still holds (admittedly with a
fairly small sample, maybe a couple of hundred threads.)
Top DevX Stories
Easy Web Services with SQL Server 2005 HTTP Endpoints
JavaOne 2005: Java Platform Roadmap Focuses on Ease of Development, Sun Focuses on the "Free" in F.O.S.S.
Wed Yourself to UML with the Power of Associations
Microsoft to Add AJAX Capabilities to ASP.NET
IBM's Cloudscape Versus MySQL