
Re: Math People  Help!
Matt,
Wow! I don't think I have ever seen anyone so angry on this newsgroup before!
I said I would not hire someone who could not solve this problem and I still
stand by this. Why? Because this is the most basic of basic algebra AND even
without algebra skills you should have good enough problem solving abilities
to find the answer (without trial and error). This is the equivalent to finishing
high school (australian term ages 12 to 18) without being able to read.
However, I am sure you are capable enough that you could be taught this level
of algebra with an hour or learn it yourself in a few hours. The biggest
barrier I find to teaching someone algebra is that they cannot understand
that a number can be represented by a letter. But you already comprehend
this  ie dim x as long.
Do yourself a favour and get a tutor. There are plenty of uni students who
will do this for $15 an hour. You will definately not regret it.
Michael Culley
"Matt Markus" <matt_markus@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Hi Lenny 
>
>"Lenny Toulson" <ltoulson@nospam.net> wrote in message
>news:3a43724f$1@news.devx.com...
>> 1. Have you graduated high school? If so, in what state/country? Do
they
>> grant diplomas for students without any algebra classes?
>>
>> 2. The question wasn't to test your math skills so much as your
>
>OF COURSE IT WAS!!!!! I certainly wasn't to test my VB skills!!!!!!
>
>With all due respect, sir, you sound like a complete idiot by saying that.
>I'm telling you, right now, as I sit here, that I personally know people
>that are very successful programmers, who make a lot of money, have proven
>themeselves time and time again and *CANNOT* solve that algebra
>prolbem!!!!!!!! DO YOU UNDERSTAND THIS?????? IT IS POSSIBLE! Why is it
>possible? BECAUSE I HAVE PROOF!!!!!
>
>God, you sound like completely narrowminded fool by making such statements.
><****>
>
>

Re: Math People  Help!
Patrick, nobody's listening to you. Go away  you're rude and aggressive and
have nothing remotely insightful to say.
Later
"D. Patrick Hoerter" <phoerter@NO_SPAMMERS_bellatlantic.NET_net> wrote:
>Brian,
>
>
>Brian Patrick <bpatrick100@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3a438167$1@news.devx.com...
>>
>> Lenny I'm giving you the same response I gave to Ian.
>>
>> Consider this for a moment...
>>
>> I've been developing software for over 5 years and have MCSD
>certification.
>
>BFD.
>
>> I didn't go to college, so the only algebra I've been *taught* was around
>> 10 years ago in high school. I've learned all my programming skills
>through
>> on the job experience, books, magazines, newsgroups, vb and asp related
>web
>> sites, and pushing myself by coding on my personal time and learning new
>> things.
>
>You and 452,000,000 other developers. So what?
>
>>
>> I am a very accomplished programmer, and have received recognition from
>every
>> employer I've worked for. I require no supervision and can complete all
>> aspects of the software development life cycle on my own (Design, Data
>Modeling,
>> Coding, Testing, Implementation) I am confident that I can develop a
>solution
>> for any business need, and have proven that to myself and my employers
>time
>> and again.
>
>What is this, the oneliner on top of your resume?
>
>>
>> My current employer pays me $90,000/year
>
>So what. I know guys making 5 grand a week that can't code to save their
>***. Salary proves nothing.
>
>>
>> I've *never* (in over 5 years) had any need to use an algebraic equation,
>> such as the one discussed here. I use adding, subtracting, multiplying,
>> dividing, exponents, and percentages on a regular basis.
>
>Hmm. Perhaps you need to review what algebra _really_ is, for Pete's sake.
>
>>
>> I can tell you (as well as many others) that if I was not offered a VB/ASP
>> software development job because I have forgotten basic algebra, the
>potential
>> employer would have made big mistake.
>>
>> How do you explain my success ?
>>
>
>Hard work, no doubt.
>
>> btw  I totally agree with you regarding the problem solving. That is
one
>> of my greatest qualities as a programmer. IMO, programming *is* problem
>> solving, I solve problems everday. I still can't write that algebra
>equation,
>> though...
>>
>
>Then you couldn't write an algorithm to repeatedly solve similar problems
>with varying inputs.
>
>Interview over.
>
>Regards,
>D. Patrick Hoerter
>
>

Re: Math People  Help!
Matt Markus <matt_markus@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3a453b10$1@news.devx.com...
>
> Patrick, nobody's listening to you. Go away  you're rude and aggressive
and
> have nothing remotely insightful to say.
>
> Later
Free clue: not everybody who disagrees with your POV is being rude and
aggressive.
If you seek only to have your current view validated, talk to yourself.
Regards,
D. Patrick Hoerter

Re: Math People  Help!
"Matt Markus" <matt_markus@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Interesting notions for a presumably "logical" group of programmers...
>
>So let me get this straight, for the record: "one *needs* to be know algebra
>in order to be a productive VB Programmer"?
Nobody said that. What was said was that math skills will add to a programmer's
productivity. You *can* be productive without it. You will most likely be
more
productive with it.
>That's insane. I have living
>examples here, all around me, of people who are proficient programmers but
>could *not* solve that problem; either because they never had algebra in
the
>first place, or have just forgotten it. In fact, one of the best coders
I
>know couldn't solve that problem. So explain that paradox, oh supreme
>logical ones.
There's no paradox. Have you considered that they might be even better if
they
had good math skills?
>I actually kind of regret bringing this up, now that some of you are going
>to force potential employees to abandon their focus on programming to take
>some crash course in Algebra at the local community college, not because
>they need to be a better programmer, but merely to get through the
>interview!?!
The interview is a process intended to find the people most likely to be
able to
do the job well. If you need to go to community college to get through the
interview, you will probably need it to do the job.
>Why don't you ask them to write a little application, or even
>just a procedure instead? Have them code something for God's sake!
Why not have them do both? For a lot of programming jobs, you need to
be able to do more than just code.
Anyway, why did you bring this subject up if you aren't at all interested
in hearing peoples' answers to your question? Math skills are useful to
programmers, and **** near everybody else doing a job from serving
hamburgers at Macca's on up.
Travis Hall

Re: Math People  Help!
"Matt Markus" <matt_markus@hotmail.com> wrote:
>"Ian Post" <SpamFree@TheWay.ToBe> wrote in message
>news:3a436ace$1@news.devx.com...
>
>> OK, here's one for you: Write an application to solve the chicken problem.
>> How would you do that if you do not know how yourself?
>
>Yeah, that's a realistic VB application!
No, it's not. A real VB application of a related type would have to apply
the
same principles but would be much more complex.
Way back before I became a programmer, I remember working with a
program which solved matrix algebra. That program had been used in
realworld projects  things relating to mining and construction, if I recall
my lecturer's example correctly. How could you possibly write such a
program without knowing algebra?
>Write an app to provide cost estimating on construction projects,
>> giving the user options based on current prices of product and the most
>> costeffective manner of completing the project. How could you do that
>> without these types of basic math skills?
>
>You do *not* need to know algebra to do that, basic math skills yes, but
not
>algebra!
Algebra *is* basic maths.
And that particular problem is in an area known, in mathematical circles,
as
optimization. It involves huge amounts of algebra, for nontrivial problems.
I guess you could write a program to do optimization by trial and error,
but
it would be horrendously inefficient.
Travis Hall

Re: Math People  Help!
"Ian Post" <SpamFree@TheWay.ToBe> wrote:
>
>Are you sure of that? It is possible that certain problemsolving skills
>that you have developed without formal education in the subject would be
>recognized as algebraic by others?
Actually, this is quite common. Back when I was earning my keep as a maths
tutor, I found that a big part of my job was "tricking" kids into doing their
maths homework by applying the same skills they used in everyday life. They
routinely had math skills that they just didn't realise they had, until I
persuaded them to approach the problem a certain way.
Travis Hall

Re: Math People  Help!
"Colin McGuigan" <colin@chicor.com> wrote:
>
>In fact, I find it more plausible
>that someone would not be very good at English and still be an excellent
>programmer, simply because of all the H1Bs around.
If it were made possible to write computer software in plain English, it
would be discovered that computer programmers do not speak plain English.
Travis Hall

Re: Math People  Help!
Matt Markus wrote:
> >
> > 2. The question wasn't to test your math skills so much as your
[problemsolving skills]
>
> OF COURSE IT WAS!!!!! I certainly wasn't to test my VB skills!!!!!!
> God, you sound like completely narrowminded fool by making such statements.
> <****>
When I interview, the single MOST important question on my mind is
"will this person get along with the other members of the team?"
Programming, math, all that stuff can be learned.
Temperament doesn't seem to change much.
I've been known to stress applicants a little, to see if they'll
a) lash out
b) back themselves into a defensive corner
c) ask for help
d) give up
because in real life, job stress happens.
I'm really glad you started this thread with (c), because the post I'm now quoting
is both (a) and (b), either of which would normally get you crossed off my list.
Bob O`Bob

I can't understand how people can look at the history of computing languages
and then believe that foisting off more work on the humans is a step forward.

Re: Math People  Help!
> Lenny I'm giving you the same response I gave to Ian.
Please don't do that. One copy of each post is sufficient. Thanks!

Phil Weber
DevX Newsgroup Admin

Re: Math People  Help!
> If an account will accrue 8% interest per year, what amount
> of money will I need to invest to have $200,000 in 10 years?
Colin: You don't need algebra to solve that in VB :)
dAPR = 0.08
nPeriods = 10
dTarget = 200000
dStart = PV(dAPR, nPeriods, 0, dTarget)

Phil Weber

Re: Math People  Help!
D. Patrick Hoerter <phoerter@NO_SPAMMERS_bellatlantic.NET_net> wrote in
message news:3a4438e3@news.devx.com...
> Actually, a Turing machine was all you _really_ needed, wasn't it? LOL.
Well, a Turing machine is all you _ever_ need. =P

Colin McGuigan

Re: Math People  Help!
Phil Weber <pweber@devx.com> wrote in message
news:3a49d1f0$1@news.devx.com...
> Colin: You don't need algebra to solve that in VB :)
>
> dAPR = 0.08
> nPeriods = 10
> dTarget = 200000
> dStart = PV(dAPR, nPeriods, 0, dTarget)
Listen, Phil, I've had enough of you countering my points with your
socalled 'logic'... =)

Colin McGuigan

Re: Math People  Help!
Hello Bob 
Bob O`Bob <bob@cluestick.org> wrote:
>Matt Markus wrote:
>> >
>> > 2. The question wasn't to test your math skills so much as your
> [problemsolving skills]
>>
>> OF COURSE IT WAS!!!!! I certainly wasn't to test my VB skills!!!!!!
>
>> God, you sound like completely narrowminded fool by making such statements.
>> <****>
>
>
>When I interview, the single MOST important question on my mind is
>
> "will this person get along with the other members of the team?"
>
>
>Programming, math, all that stuff can be learned.
>Temperament doesn't seem to change much.
>
>I've been known to stress applicants a little, to see if they'll
>a) lash out
>b) back themselves into a defensive corner
>c) ask for help
>d) give up
>because in real life, job stress happens.
>
>I'm really glad you started this thread with (c), because the post I'm now
quoting
>is both (a) and (b), either of which would normally get you crossed off
my list.
>
>
>
> Bob O`Bob
Finally, the voice of reason!
It's quite alright that I would get crossed off your list for those reasons
 they make sense. I don't think, however, that I would lash out or get defensive
in a professional job context  I never have before. I think it's a bit different
when your dealing with personalities that only are experienced through text.
But if I was crossed off because I forgot algebra, that, obviously, is where
my quarrels lay. I’ll tell ya what really got me hot though: when someone
implies that me, or anyone else for that matter, has *no* chance of being
a good programmer until they go out and learn algebra. That kind of talk
can discourage a lot of potential programmers. And it's no surprise that
the people on here making such absolute statements seem to have massively
inflated ego's  such that they have find it very hard to muster up any sort
of compassion for the inexperienced.
FYI: I was offered the job despite my mathematical shortcomings. I know you're
all very proud. :)
Matt

Re: Math People  Help!
Matt,
>FYI: I was offered the job despite my mathematical shortcomings. I know
you're
>all very proud. :)
>
>Matt
>
Way to go!!!! good job!
Now if I only could get an interview with a company I would be laughing.
:(
Duane...

Re: Math People  Help!
"Matt Markus" <matt_markus@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>But if I was crossed off because I forgot algebra, that, obviously, is where
>my quarrels lay. I’ll tell ya what really got me hot though: when someone
>implies that me, or anyone else for that matter, has *no* chance of being
>a good programmer until they go out and learn algebra.
I haven't seen anybody say that, as I already commented. What has been
said is, a programmer will be generally better if he understands basic maths.
(And yes, lowlevel algebra is basic maths.)
>That kind of talk can discourage a lot of potential programmers.
Or alternatively could encourage a lot of potential programmers to pay
attention in their high school maths classes. As a maths tutor, I used
to hear the same objections from students all the time: "This won't really
matter when I leave school". When I told the students that yes, it would
matter, and gave them the reasons why, they listened, and they learned
what they should have been learning. Not once did I have a student
abandon their plans for the future just because they had to learn a bit
of maths, no matter how hard they had been finding it.
>And it's no surprise that
>the people on here making such absolute statements seem to have massively
>inflated ego's  such that they have find it very hard to muster up any
sort
>of compassion for the inexperienced.
Sometimes, it is more compassionate to tell the inexperienced what they really
should know. In this case, that means saying, "Yes, maths does matter".
>FYI: I was offered the job despite my mathematical shortcomings. I know
you're
>all very proud. :)
Congratulations. However, consider for a moment what would have happened
if
another one of the candidates had the same qualifications and experience
as
you, and was just as charming in the interview, but could also solve simple
maths
problems such as the one you presented. Don't you think that person would
have
been offered the job instead of you? And wouldn't the interviewer have been
correct to do so?
Frankly, if a job candidate not only failed to fulfill the selection criteria
for a job,
but tried to tell me he shouldn't even be trying to meet them, I certainly
would not hire that person. I bet you didn't raise the questions you have
raised
here when you were with the interviewer, right? Why don't you go back and
ask
your new boss whether maths skills might be useful during your employment
there.
Travis Hall
Posting Permissions
 You may not post new threads
 You may not post replies
 You may not post attachments
 You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules

Development Centers
 Android Development Center
 Cloud Development Project Center
 HTML5 Development Center
 Windows Mobile Development Center
