late binding problem

[Itai Raz]

Hi. Long time no see.

Here's my problem:

I'm trying to invoke a method from within a dll I've created in VB (in ASP,
of course).

The object is created just fine and everything goes smoothly (everything
being changing properties of the object), but, when I try invoking the
method that takes as an argument an object, I get a "type mismatch". When I
try running this code from VB using early binding, it works fine, but when I
use late binding, just like in ASP, it fails the same way.

HEEEEELLLLLLPPP!

Thanks,

Itai

P.S.

The code looks like this:
set dlist=server.CreateObject("dllName.className")
set dlistPers=server.CreateObject("dllName2.className")
dlistPers.methodInvoked xmlRoot, dlist


(xmlRoot is an IXMLDOMELEMENT)

[Dev Ashish]

Is dlistPers the default interface for the class? Have you tried defining
the params As Variants and recompiling?

-- Dev

Itai Raz wrote in message <38e3a088$1@news.devx.com>...
:Hi. Long time no see.
:
:Here's my problem:
:
:I'm trying to invoke a method from within a dll I've created in VB (in ASP,
f course).
:
:The object is created just fine and everything goes smoothly (everything
:being changing properties of the object), but, when I try invoking the
:method that takes as an argument an object, I get a "type mismatch". When I
:try running this code from VB using early binding, it works fine, but when
I
:use late binding, just like in ASP, it fails the same way.
:
:HEEEEELLLLLLPPP!
:
:Thanks,
:
:Itai
:
:P.S.
:
:The code looks like this:
:set dlist=server.CreateObject("dllName.className")
:set dlistPers=server.CreateObject("dllName2.className")
:dlistPers.methodInvoked xmlRoot, dlist
:
:
xmlRoot is an IXMLDOMELEMENT)
:
:

[Itai Raz]

defining the variables as variants would work just fine. However, this dll
is being used by other platforms, such as VB, so I don't want to just strike
out all objects declarations. Anyway, the solution we finally came up with
was creating another method that will take a variant instead of an object,
and this method will call the original method, after converting the variant
to be an object.

Thanks,

Itai

[Dev Ashish]

Itai Raz wrote in message <38e8df4e$2@news.devx.com>...
:Anyway, the solution we finally came up with
:was creating another method that will take a variant instead of an object,
:and this method will call the original method, after converting the variant
:to be an object.
:

That's probably what I would've suggested also, given the typeless problems
here, FWIW.

-- Dev